Solar power advocates are inclined to say things like:
In just one hour the amount of energy that the earth receives from the sun exceeds the energy consumed by all of mankind in one year.This is presumably intended to reassure us that solar power is plentiful, and that we should easily be able to harness enough of it.
But the cause of global warming is the fact that the Earth has to get rid of the same amount of energy every hour, or it gets warmer.
It leaves out our consumption of food.
It certainly does not include the huge energy cost of the fresh water that is supplied to us by evaporation from the oceans. Worse yet, the aquifers that human industrial and agricultural thirst is depleting represent an energy demand that exceeds that supply of immediate solar fresh water.
The global warming problem is that the solar energy penetrating the earth's atmosphere has to be re-radiated, and global warming is the direct consequence of the fact that the Earth's surface (in particular the oceans) now has to be warmer than it used to be, to radiate the energy out again.
In fact, the actual heat generated by industrial processes is unimportant! A drop of one part in 8000 of the Earth's ability to radiate all the solar energy back into space, is enough to make a bigger difference. Carbon dioxide, and worse still methane leaks from fossil carbon mining (e.g. "Natural gas" fracking) are the problem.
One very significant mechanism for re-radiating the energy out into space must be the evaporation of water from the planet's surface, and its condensation as clouds high in the atmosphere. For every litre of water so transported, 2250 kilojoules of energy are released at high altitude. Some of that radiates out into space.
Humans don't do much better with their machines. The biggest and most powerful of these, hydroelectric turbines, like the old watermills, use the gravitational energy of rainfall that has fallen high up in the hills of a watershed, to drive the machinery. The energy that evaporated the water was about 2250 kiloJoules per kilogram of water. If you have a turbine with a head of 100 metres, you get one kiloJoule out of each kilogram of water flowing. That's an energy conversion efficiency of about 0.05 percent. Hurricanes do much better, because the height of the "engine" is stratospheric. On the Columbia river, there are several hydro dams, so you get more energy from each kg. of water.
Note that "14.5 billion kilowatt-hours" needs to be divided by a million times the number of hours in a year, to compare it with the annual output of one base-load 1000 MW (one Gigawatt) nuclear or coal burning plant.
It comes to just over 1.65 GW-yr, and half of it is geothermal.
Unfortunately, the wind turbine production includes the Altamont Pass wind farm, which is perhaps the worst known wind turbine killer of birds, at a rate of thousands per year, soome of which are rare and endangered species. An eagle or a hawk does not expect to have to pay attention to menaces descending upon it at the speed of a 100 metre turbine blade.
The capacity factors which you can compute for SCE's wind and solar components are 23.6% and 27.8%, whereas geothermal (if you can get it) gives 92.5%.
We do know that human agriculture has endeavored to harness the energy from the sun to feed people.
It turns out that the efficiency available is such that very large areas of land are required, far more than if we could fuel our bodies directly with sunlight.
It takes even more, if we want to eat other animals.
It is probable that, without artificially produced nitrate fertilisers, the Earth's present human population of 7,000 million could not be fed. The Inca civilization was one of the earliest to use nitrate enhancements on their soil. They got it from fairly old bird and bat dung accumulations. It's called guano. There's not much left.
Remember that a large proportion of the earth's surface is the sea, where it's pretty difficult to collect solar energy.
Worse still, that's where hurricanes are born.
A hurricane is an instance of what phyicists call a heat engine. It acquires energy from the warm water of the ocean, and transfers it to the stratosphere, where it can be radiated into outer space. A typical one of these engines is vaster than anything humans have ever devised. It is as big as any two eastern US states, and several miles high. Its mechanical output is a large pattern of winds many times too strong to harness. We have trouble enough even trying to predict where hurricanes will go. Even the most enthusiastic "renewable energy" folk don't suggest "hurricane power".
A great deal of the energy is already being used to sustain the lives of non-humans. Actually, if you eat swordfish, how much energy do you consume? Is it the caloric value of the flesh you eat? Or that of the whole fish? Shouldn't it be that of the fish the swordfish ate? Plus that of the smaller fish and plankton that the prey of the swordfish ate.